Monday, August 23, 2010
How much coverage is right for testing?
Here is
an amusing parable on test coverage.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Newer Post
Older Post
Home
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
DunnDunnDunn
Hard lessons in software
Blog Archive
►
2018
(1)
►
October
(1)
►
2015
(5)
►
June
(1)
►
May
(1)
►
April
(1)
►
February
(1)
►
January
(1)
►
2014
(6)
►
September
(3)
►
August
(1)
►
July
(1)
►
April
(1)
►
2013
(6)
►
July
(1)
►
June
(1)
►
April
(1)
►
March
(3)
►
2012
(5)
►
June
(1)
►
May
(1)
►
April
(1)
►
March
(1)
►
February
(1)
►
2011
(28)
►
October
(1)
►
September
(1)
►
August
(3)
►
July
(12)
►
June
(1)
►
April
(3)
►
February
(3)
►
January
(4)
▼
2010
(53)
►
December
(7)
►
November
(5)
►
October
(11)
►
September
(7)
▼
August
(17)
Linux: How strace works
Bug in Blogspot: Spaces after periods
Python: Comprehension loop variables
"8 things I wish I knew before starting a business"
Giving F# another look
Ocaml: Improved polymorphism
Maximum argument length in Linux
How much coverage is right for testing?
Ocaml in the real world (or at least Wall Street)
Errors in moving to 64-bit architecture
More Perl strangeness: eval and $@
On hiring bad programmers
bash: little-known alias trick
More on 'mk' (plan9)
Fun new language
Better than make?
Better than bash?
►
July
(2)
►
June
(1)
►
May
(3)
About Me
Christopher Dunn
View my complete profile
Followers
No comments:
Post a Comment